Engineering Analysis/Matrices: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>PokestarFan
m Left Pseudo-Inverse: {{BookCat}}/possible general fixes using AWB
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 01:20, 15 June 2017

Template:Engineering Analysis

Norms

Induced Norms

n-Norm

Frobenius Norm

Spectral Norm

Derivatives

Consider the following set of linear equations:

a=bx1+cx2
d=ex1+fx2

We can define the matrix A to represent the coefficients, the vector B as the results, and the vector x as the variables:

A=[bcef]
B=[ad]
x=[x1x2]

And rewriting the equation in terms of the matrices, we get:

B=Ax

Now, let's say we want the derivative of this equation with respect to the vector x:

ddxB=ddxAx

We know that the first term is constant, so the derivative of the left-hand side of the equation is zero. Analyzing the right side shows us:

Pseudo-Inverses

There are special matrices known as pseudo-inverses, that satisfies some of the properties of an inverse, but not others. To recap, If we have two square matrices A and B, that are both n × n, then if the following equation is true, we say that A is the inverse of B, and B is the inverse of A:

AB=BA=I

Right Pseudo-Inverse

Consider the following matrix:

R=AT[AAT]1

We call this matrix R the right pseudo-inverse of A, because:

AR=I

but

RAI

We will denote the right pseudo-inverse of A as A

Left Pseudo-Inverse

Consider the following matrix:

L=[ATA]1AT

We call L the left pseudo-inverse of A because

LA=I

but

ALI

We will denote the left pseudo-inverse of A as A