UMD Analysis Qualifying Exam/Aug12 Real: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Problem 1: edited brackets to look better.
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 22:04, 28 August 2021

Problem 1

Compute the following limit. Justify your answer.

limn0(1+xn)nsin(xn)dx.

Solution 1

We will use the dominated convergence theorem. First, note that for x0 and n2,

(1+x/n)n=1+x+n12nx2+...1+x+n12nx21+x+14x2=(1+x/2)2.

Therefore,

sin(x/n)(1+x/n)n1(1+x/2)2

and this function is in L1([0,]), with

01(1+x/2)2=2.

Therefore, by the LDCT,

limn0sin(x/n)(1+x/n)n=0limnsin(x/n)(1+x/n)n=00=0

Problem 3

Assume f is absolutely continuous on an interval [a,b] and there is a continuous function g such that f=g a.e. Show that f is differentiable at every x[a,b] and that f(x)=g(x) everywhere on [a,b].

Solution 3

If f(x) exists, then by definition, f(x)=limh0f(x+h)f(x)h. So we need to show that this limit both exists and is equal to g(x).

Then by the absolute continuity of f, limh0f(x+h)f(x)h=limh0xx+hg(t)dth.

Since, g(x) is continuous, then for any ϵ>0 there exists some δ>0 such that for h<δ,|g(x+h)g(x)|<ϵ.

Therefore,

limh0f(x+h)f(x)h=limh0xx+hg(t)dth=limh0h<δxx+hg(t)dth<limh0h<δxx+hg(x)+ϵdth=g(x)+ϵ.

The same argument gives a lower bound, giving us altogether

g(x)ϵ<limh0f(x+h)f(x)h<g(x)+ϵ. Therefore, the limit exists (i.e. f is differentiable) and the difference quotient goes to g(x).


Problem 5

Let f be a nonnegative Lebesgue integrable function on [0,1]. Denote by m the Lebesgue measure on [0,1].

(i) Prove that, for each ϵ>0, there exists a c>0 such that

{x[0,1]:f(x)c}fdm<ϵ.

(ii) Prove that, for each ϵ>0, there is a δ>0 such that for each measurable subset E[0,1]:

if m(E)<δ, then Efdm<ϵ.

Solution 5

(i) Fix epsilon greater than zero. Then, consider the sets Sn={x in [0,1] : n-1<=f(x)<n}. The partial sums of the integrals of f over Sn comprise a monotonically increasing sequence of real numbers, bounded by the finite integral of f over [0,1].

Hence, this sequence converges, and the tail of the sequence, which is the integral of f over the set {x in [0,1] : f(x)>= n}, must eventually be less than epsilon for some n.

(ii) Fix epsilon greater than zero. By part (i), there exists some constant c such that, given the set A={x in [0,1] : f(x)>=c}, the integral of f over A is less than epsilon/2. On the complement of A (in [0,1]), f is bounded above by c, and so any set of measure less than epsilon/2c will produce an integral whose value less than epsilon/2.

If m(A) is nonzero, take delta to be the minimum of m(A) and epsilon/2c. Given any measurable E in [0,1] with m(E) less than delta, the portion in A and the portion in Ac will each have integrals with values at most epsilon/2, so the integral of f over E has a value of at most epsilon.

If m(A)=0, then f is bounded almost everywhere on [0,1], and we simply take delta to be epsilon/c.Template:BookCat