Physics with Calculus/Electromagnetism/Field Energy: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>JackBot
m top: using AWB
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 21:58, 9 September 2016

Taken from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatics#Electrostatic_energy


A single test particle's potential energy, UEsingle, can be calculated from a line integral of the work, qnEd. We integrate from a point at infinity, and assume a collection of N particles of charge Qn, are already situated at the points ri. This potential energy (in Joules) is:

UEsingle=qϕ(r)=q4πε0i=1NQi𝔯i

where 𝔯i=rri, is the distance of each charge Qi from the test charge q, which situated at the point r, and ϕ(r) is the electric potential that would be at r if the test charge were not present. If only two charges are present, the potential energy is keQ1Q2/r. The total electric potential energy due a collection of N charges is calculating by assembling these particles one at a time:

UEtotal=14πε0j=1NQji=1j1Qirij=12i=1NQiϕi,

where the following sum from, j = 1 to N, excludes i = j:

ϕi=14πε0j=1(ji)NQj4πε0rij.

This electric potential, ϕi is what would be measured at ri if the charge Qi were missing. This formula obviously excludes the (infinite) energy that would be required to assemble each point charge from a disperse cloud of charge. The sum over charges can be converted into an integral over charge density using the prescription ()()ρd3r:

UEtotal=12ρ(r)ϕ(r)d3r=ε02|𝐄|2d3r,

This second expression for electrostatic energy uses the fact that the electric field is the negative gradient of the electric potential, as well as vector calculus identities in a way that resembles integration by parts. These two integrals for electric field energy seem to indicate two mutually exclusive formulas for electrostatic energy density, namely 12ρϕ and ε02E2; they yield equal values for the total electrostatic energy only if both are integrated over all space.

Template:BookCat