Commutative Algebra/Noetherian rings
Rings as modules
Proof: Being a submodule means being an additive subgroup closed under the module operation. In the above context, this is exactly the definition of ideals.
Transfer of the properties
From theorems 6.7 and 14.1, we obtain the following characterisation of Noetherian rings:
In analogy to theorem 6.11, we further obtain
Proof 1: Proceed in analogy to theorem 6.11, using the isomorphism theorem of rings.
Proof 2: Use theorem 6.11 directly.
New properties in the ring setting
When rings are considered, several new properties show themselves in the noetherian case.
{{TextBox| M=0 | W=100% | BG=#FFFFFF |1=Theorem 14.4:
Noetherian rings and constructions
In this section we will prove theorems involving Noetherian rings and module or localisation-like structures over them.
Proof 1:
Consider any ideal . We form the ideal , that shall contain all the leading coefficients of any polynomials in ; that is
- .
Since is Noetherian, as a finite set of generators; call those generators . All belong to a certain as a leading coefficient; let thus be the degree of that polynomial for all . Set
- .
We further form the ideals and of and claim that
- .
Indeed, certainly and thus (see the section on modules). The other direction is seen as thus: If , , then we can set to be the leading coefficient of , write for suitable and then subtract , to obtain
so long as . By repetition of this procedure, we subtract a polynomial of to obtain a polynomial in , that is, .
However, both and are finitely generated ideals ( is finitely generated as an -module and hence Noetherian by the previous theorem, which is why so is as a submodule of a Noetherian module). Since the sum of finitely generated ideals is clearly finitely generated, is finitely generated.
Exercises
- Let be a Noetherian ring, and let be an -module. Prove that is Noetherian if and only if it is finitely generated. (Hint: Is there any surjective ring homomorphism , where is the number of generators of ? If so, what does the first isomorphism theorem say to that?)