Famous Theorems of Mathematics/e is transcendental

From testwiki
Revision as of 18:25, 1 February 2025 by imported>יהודה שמחה ולדמן
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The mathematical constant e=n=01n!=2.718281 is a transcendental number (or inalgebraic).

In other words, it is not a root of any polynomial with integer coefficients.

Proof

Let us assume that e is algebraic, so there exists a polynomial

P(x)=a0+a1x+a2x2++anxn[x]

such that P(e)=0.

Part 1

Let f(x) be a polynomial of degree d. Let us define F(x)=k=0df(k)(x). Taking its derivative yields:

F(x)=k=0df(k+1)(x)=k=1df(k)(x)=F(x)f(x)

Let us define G(x)=exF(x). Taking its derivative yields:

G(x)=exF(x)exF(x)=ex[F(x)F(x)]=exf(x)

By the fundamental theorem of calculus, we get:

G(x)G(0)=exF(x)e0F(0)=0xetf(t)dtF(x)exF(0)=0xextf(t)dt

Now let:

F(m)emF(0)=0memtf(t)dt=AmamF(m)amemF(0)=amAm

Summing all the terms yields

m=1namF(m)m=1namemF(0)=m=1namAmm=1namF(m)F(0)m=1namem=m=1namAmm=1namF(m)F(0)(a0)=m=1namAmm=0namF(m)=m=1namAm

Part 2

Lemma: Let f(x) be a polynomial with a root x0 of multiplicity d1. Then f(j)(x0)=0 for all 0jd1.

Proof: By strong induction.

Let us write f(x)=(xx0)dQ(x), with Q(x) a polynomial such that Q(x0)0.

For d=1 we get:

f(0)(x0)=f(x0)=0

Assume that for all 1dk the claim holds for all 0jd1.
We shall prove that for d=k+1 the claim holds for all 0jk:

f(x)=(xx0)k+1Q(x)f(1)(x)=(k+1)(xx0)kQ(x)+(xx0)k+1Q(1)(x)=(xx0)k[(k+1)Q(x)+(xx0)Q(1)(x)]=(xx0)kR(x)

The Template:Font color is of multiplicity k1, with R(z) a polynomial such that R(x0)0.
Hence their product satisfies the induction hypothesis.

Part 3

Let us now define a polynomial

f(x)=1(p1)!xp1[(1x)(2x)(nx)]p=(n!)p(p1)!xp1+m=p(n+1)p1bm(p1)!xm:bm

and p is a prime number such that p>max{a0,n}. We get:

f(k)(x)=m=k(n+1)p1k!(p1)!(mk)bmxmk:pk(n+1)p1

hence for all kp, the function f(k)(x) is a polynomial with integer coefficients all divisible by p.


By part 2, for all 1mn we get:

F(m)=k=0(n+1)p1f(k)(m)=k=p(n+1)p1f(k)(m)

Therefore F(m) is also an integer divisible by p.

On the other hand, for m=0 we get:

F(0)=k=0(n+1)p1f(k)(0)=k=p1(n+1)p1f(k)(0)

but f(p1)(0)=(n!)p, and n,a0 are not divisible by p. Therefore a0F(0) is not divisible by p.

Conclusion: N=m=0namF(m) is an integer not divisible by p, and particularly N0.

Part 4

By part 2, by the triangle inequality for integrals we get:

|Am|=|0memtf(t)dt|0m|emt||f(t)|dtem0mnp1(p1)!(n!)pdtem0nnp1(p1)!(n!)pdt=em(nn!)p(p1)!

By the triangle Inequality we get:

0<|N|=|m=0namF(m)|=|m=1namAm|m=1n|amAm|(m=1n|am|em)(nn!)p(p1)!

But limp(nn!)p(p1)!=0, hence for sufficiently large p we get 0<|N|<1. A contradiction.

Conclusion: e is transcendental.

Template:BookCat