Topics in Abstract Algebra/Lie algebras: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>ShakespeareFan00
m unclosed italics
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 09:37, 11 June 2024

Let V be a vector space. (V,[,]) is called a Lie algebra if it is equipped with the bilinear operator V×VV, denoted by [,], subject to the properties: for every x,y,zV

  • (i) [x, x] = 0
  • (ii) [x, [y, z]] + [y, [z, x]] + [z, [x, y]] = 0

(ii) is called the Jacobi identity.

Example: For x,y𝐑3, define [x,y]=x×y, the cross product of x and y. The known properties of the cross products show that (R3,[,]) is a Lie algebra.

Example: Let Der(V)={DExt(V):D(xy)=(Dx)y+xDy}. A member of Der(V) is called a derivation. Define [x,y]=xyyx. Then [x,y]Der(V).

Theorem Let V be a finite-dimensional vector space.

  • (i) If 𝔤𝔤𝔩k(V) is a Lie algebra consisting of nilpotent elements, then there exists vV such that x(v)=0 for every x𝔤.
  • (ii) If 𝔤 is solvable, then there exists a common eigenvalue vV.

Theorem (Engel) 𝔤 is nilpotent if and only if ad(x) is nilpotent for every x𝔤.
Proof: The direct part is clear. For the converse, note that from the preceding theorem that ad(𝔤) is a subalgebra of 𝔫k. Thus, ad(𝔤) is nilpotent and so is 𝔤.

Theorem 𝔤 is solvable if and only if [𝔤,𝔤] is nilpotent.
Proof: Suppose 𝔤 is solvable. Then ad[𝔤,𝔤] is a subalgebra of 𝔟k. Thus, ad[𝔤,𝔤]𝔫k. Hence, ad[𝔤,𝔤] is nilpotent, and so [𝔤,𝔤] is nilpotent. For the converse, note the exact sequence:

0[𝔤,𝔤]𝔤𝔤/[𝔤,𝔤]0

Since both [𝔤,𝔤] and 𝔤/[𝔤,𝔤] are solvable, 𝔤 is solvable.

3 Therorem (Weyl's theorem) Every representation of a finite-dimensional semisimple Lie algebra:

𝔤End(V)

is completely reducible.
Proof: It suffices to prove that every 𝔤-submodule has a 𝔤-submodule complement. Furthermore, the proof reduces to the case when W is simple (as a module) and has codimension one. Indeed, given a 𝔤-submodule W, let EHom(V,W) be the subspace consisting of elements f such that f|W is a scalar multiplication. Since any commutator of elements fE is zero (that is, multiplication by zero), it is clear that E/[E,E] has dimension 1. E may not be simple, but by induction on the dimension of E, we can assume that. Hence, E has complement of dimension 1, which is spanned by, say, f. It follows that V is the direct sum of W and the kernel of f. Now, to complete the proof, let W be a simple 𝔤-submodule of codimension 1. Let c be a Casimir element of 𝔤End(V). It follows that V is the direct sum of W and the kernel of c. (TODO: obviously, the proof is very sketchy; we need more details.)

References

Template:BookCat