Topics in Abstract Algebra/Lie algebras

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Let V be a vector space. (V,[,]) is called a Lie algebra if it is equipped with the bilinear operator V×VV, denoted by [,], subject to the properties: for every x,y,zV

  • (i) [x, x] = 0
  • (ii) [x, [y, z]] + [y, [z, x]] + [z, [x, y]] = 0

(ii) is called the Jacobi identity.

Example: For x,y𝐑3, define [x,y]=x×y, the cross product of x and y. The known properties of the cross products show that (R3,[,]) is a Lie algebra.

Example: Let Der(V)={DExt(V):D(xy)=(Dx)y+xDy}. A member of Der(V) is called a derivation. Define [x,y]=xyyx. Then [x,y]Der(V).

Theorem Let V be a finite-dimensional vector space.

  • (i) If 𝔀𝔀𝔩k(V) is a Lie algebra consisting of nilpotent elements, then there exists vV such that x(v)=0 for every x𝔀.
  • (ii) If 𝔀 is solvable, then there exists a common eigenvalue vV.

Theorem (Engel) 𝔀 is nilpotent if and only if ad(x) is nilpotent for every x𝔀.
Proof: The direct part is clear. For the converse, note that from the preceding theorem that ad(𝔀) is a subalgebra of 𝔫k. Thus, ad(𝔀) is nilpotent and so is 𝔀.

Theorem 𝔀 is solvable if and only if [𝔀,𝔀] is nilpotent.
Proof: Suppose 𝔀 is solvable. Then ad[𝔀,𝔀] is a subalgebra of π”Ÿk. Thus, ad[𝔀,𝔀]𝔫k. Hence, ad[𝔀,𝔀] is nilpotent, and so [𝔀,𝔀] is nilpotent. For the converse, note the exact sequence:

0[𝔀,𝔀]𝔀𝔀/[𝔀,𝔀]0

Since both [𝔀,𝔀] and 𝔀/[𝔀,𝔀] are solvable, 𝔀 is solvable.

3 Therorem (Weyl's theorem) Every representation of a finite-dimensional semisimple Lie algebra:

𝔀End(V)

is completely reducible.
Proof: It suffices to prove that every 𝔀-submodule has a 𝔀-submodule complement. Furthermore, the proof reduces to the case when W is simple (as a module) and has codimension one. Indeed, given a 𝔀-submodule W, let EHom(V,W) be the subspace consisting of elements f such that f|W is a scalar multiplication. Since any commutator of elements fE is zero (that is, multiplication by zero), it is clear that E/[E,E] has dimension 1. E may not be simple, but by induction on the dimension of E, we can assume that. Hence, E has complement of dimension 1, which is spanned by, say, f. It follows that V is the direct sum of W and the kernel of f. Now, to complete the proof, let W be a simple 𝔀-submodule of codimension 1. Let c be a Casimir element of 𝔀End(V). It follows that V is the direct sum of W and the kernel of c. (TODO: obviously, the proof is very sketchy; we need more details.)

References

Template:BookCat