Differentiable Manifolds/Product manifolds and Lie groups

From testwiki
Revision as of 00:18, 15 June 2017 by imported>PokestarFan (The product manifold: {{BookCat}}/possible general fixes using AWB)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Navigation

The product manifold

Template:TextBox

Template:TextBox

Lemma 10.3:

Let O2d be open. Then for each (x,y)O, there exists ϵ(x,y)>0 such that

Bϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y)O

Proof:

Let (x,y)O be arbitrary. We choose δ>0 such that Bδ((x,y))O. Then we define ϵ(x,y):=δ2. Then, by the triangle inequality we have for every (z,w)Bϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y):

(z,w)(x,y)=(z,0)+(0,w)(x,0)(0,y)(z,0)(x,0)+(0,w)(0,y)=zx+wy<2ϵ(x,y)=δ

Therefore, (z,w)Bδ((x,y))O, and since (z,w)Bϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y) was arbitrary:

Bϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y)O

Lemma 10.4:

Let O,Ud be open sets. Then O×U is open in 2d.

Proof:

Due to the openness of O and U for each point (x,y) in O×U, we find ϵ1,ϵ2>0 such that Bϵ1(x)O and Bϵ2(x)U. If we define ϵ:=min{ϵ1,ϵ2}, we have for all (z,w)Bϵ((x,y)):

xz2=(x,y)(z,w)2yw2(x,y)(z,w)2

and

yw2=(x,y)(z,w)2xz2(x,y)(z,w)2

and since the function is monotonely increasing on [0,), it follows

xz<ϵ

and

yw<ϵ

and thus:

(z,w)O×U

Lemma 10.5: Let X,Y,Z,W be sets and let f:XZ and g:YW be functions. If AZ and BW, then

(f×g)1(A×B)=f1(A)×g1(B)

Proof: See exercise 2.

Theorem 10.6: The product manifold of a manifold M of class 𝒞n, where n0{} with atlas {(Oυ,ϕυ)|υΥ} really is a manifold; i. e. {(Oυ×Oo,ϕυ×ϕo)|υ,oΥ} really is an atlas of class 𝒞n.

Proof:

1. We show that for all υ,oΥ the set (ϕυ×ϕo)(Oυ×Oo) is open.

We have:

(ϕυ×ϕo)(Oυ×Oo)={(ϕυ(p),ϕo(q))2d|pOυ,qOo}=ϕυ(Oυ)×ϕo(Oo)

This set is open in 2d due to lemma 10.4, since it is the cartesian product of two open sets.

2. We prove that for all υ,oΥ, the function ϕυ×ϕo is a homeomorphism.

2.1. For bijectivity, see exercise 1.

2.2. We prove continuity.

Let O(ϕυ×ϕo)(Oυ×Oo) be open. Due to the definition of the subspace topology,

Lemma 10.4 implies that we have

O=(x,y)OBϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y)

(this equation can be proven by showing '' and '') and thus follows with lemma 10.5, that:

(ϕυ×ϕo)1(O)=(ϕυ×ϕo)1((x,y)OBϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y))=(x,y)O(ϕυ×ϕo)1(Bϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y))=(x,y)Oϕυ1(Bϵ(x,y)(x))×(ϕo)1(Bϵ(x,y)(y))

, which is open as the union of open sets (since we had equipped M×M with the product topology).

2.3. We prove continuity of the inverse.

Let OM×M be open.

3. We prove that

Lie groups

Template:TextBox

Template:TextBox

Template:TextBox

Template:TextBox

Theorem 10.11: Let G be a d-dimensional Lie group of class 𝒞n. Then for each gG the respective left multiplication function and the respective right multiplication are diffeomorphisms of class 𝒞n from G to itself.

Proof:

We only prove the claim for the left multiplication. The proof for the right multiplication goes the same way.

In this proof, the group operation of G is denoted by *.

1. We show that Lg is differentiable of class 𝒞n.

Let gG be arbitrary. Since G is a Lie group, the function

ψ*:G×GG,ψ*(g,h)=g*h

is differentiable of class 𝒞n, where G×G is equipped with the product manifold structure.

Let now (O,ϕ) and (U,θ) be two arbitrary elements in the atlas of G. We choose (V,χ) in the atlas of G such that gV. As ψ* is differentiable of class 𝒞n, the function

ϕ|*(ψ*1(O)V×U)ψ*|ψ*1(O)V×U(χ×θ)|ψ*1(O)V×U1

is contained in 𝒞n(2d,d). Therefore, also the function

f:dd,f(x)=ϕ|ψ*(ψ*1(O)V×U)ψ*|ψ*1(O)V×U(χ×θ)|ψ*1(O)V×U1(χ1(g),x)

is contained in 𝒞n(2d,d); the partial derivatives exist and are equal to the partial derivatives of the last d variables of the function

ϕ|ψ*(ψ*1(O)V×U)ψ*|ψ*1(O)V×U(χ×θ)|ψ*1(O)V×U1

. But we have for all xθ(Lg1(O)U):

f(x)=(ϕ|Lg(|Lg1(O)U)Lg|Lg1(O)Uθ|Lg1(O)U1)(x)

and therefore the function

ϕ|Lg(|Lg1(O)U)Lg|Lg1(O)Uθ|Lg1(O)U1

is contained in 𝒞n(d,d, which means the definition of differentiability of class 𝒞n is fulfilled.

2. We show that Lg is bijective.

We do so by noticing that an inverse function of Lg is given by Lg1: For arbitrary hG, we have:

Lg1(Lg(h))=g*(g1*h)=(g*g1)*h=e*h=h

and

Lg(Lg1(h))=g1*(g*h)=(g1*g)*h=e*h=h

3. We note that the inverse function is differentiable of class 𝒞n:

We use 1. with g1; g1 also is an element of G, and 1. proved that the left multiplication function is differentiable for every element of G, including g1.

Left invariant vector fields

Template:TextBox

Let us repeat the definition of a Lie subalgebra:

Definition 6.2:

Let L with [,] be a Lie algebra. A subset of L which is a Lie algebra with the restriction of [,] on that subset is called a Lie subalgebra.

Template:TextBox

Proof:

Let 𝐕,𝐖𝔤. It suffices to show that [𝐕,𝐖]𝔤, because then 𝔤 is a Lie algebra with the restriction of the vector field Lie bracket.

Indeed, we have for all g,hG and φ𝒞n(G):

(dLg)h([𝐕,𝐖](h))(φ)=[𝐕,𝐖](h)(Lg*φ)=𝐕(h)(𝐖(Lg*φ))𝐖(h)(𝐕(Lg*φ))=𝐕(h)((dLg)(𝐖φ))𝐖(h)((dLg)(𝐕φ))=𝐕(h)(𝐖(g)(φ))𝐖(h)(𝐕(g)(φ))=𝐕(h)(𝐖φLg)𝐖(h)(𝐕φLg)=𝐕(h)(Lg*(𝐖φ))𝐖(h)(Lg*(𝐕φLg))=(dLg)h(𝐕(h))(𝐖φ)(dLg)h(𝐖(h))(𝐕φ)=𝐕(gh)(𝐖φ)𝐖(gh)(𝐕φ)=[𝐕,𝐖](gh)(φ)

, where by (dLg)(𝐖φ) the function

p(dLg)p(𝐖φ)

is meant and by 𝐖(g)(φ) the function

p𝐖(gp)(φ)

is meant (as both are equal to 𝐖(Lg*φ), both are differentiable of class 𝒞n).

Template:TextBox

Proof:

We choose the function

Θ:𝔤TeG,Θ(𝐕):=𝐕(e)

We will now show that this function is the desired isomorphism.

1. We prove linearity: Let 𝐕,𝐖𝔤 and c. We have:

Θ(𝐕+c𝐖)=(𝐕+c𝐖)(e)=𝐕(e)+c𝐖(e)=Θ(𝐕)+cΘ(𝐖)

2. We prove bijectivity.

2.1. We prove injectivity.

Let Θ(𝐕)=Θ(𝐖) (i. e. 𝐕(e)=𝐖(e)) for 𝐕,𝐖𝔤. Since 𝐕,𝐖 are left invariant, it follows for all gG and φ𝒞n, that

𝐕(g)(φ)=𝐕(ge)(φ)=(dLg)e(𝐕)(φ)=𝐕(e)(Lg*(φ))=𝐖(e)(Lg*(φ))=(dLg)e(𝐖)(φ)=𝐖(ge)(φ)=𝐖(g)(φ)

2.2. We prove surjectivity.

Let 𝐕eTeG be arbitrary. We define

𝐔𝐕e(g):=(dLg)e𝐕e

Due to theorem 2.19, this is a vector field. It is also left invariant because for all g,hG and φ𝒞n(M), we have:

(dLg)h(𝐔𝐕e(h))(φ)=𝐔𝐕e(h)(Lg*(φ))=(dLh)e𝐕e(Lg*(φ))=𝐕e(Lh*(Lg*(φ)))=𝐕e(φLgLh)=𝐕e(φLgh)=(dLgh)e𝐕e(φ)=𝐔𝐕e(gh)(φ)

Further, we have for all φ𝒞n(M):

Θ(𝐔𝐕e)(φ)=𝐔𝐕e(e)(φ)=(dLe)e𝐕e(φ)=𝐕e(φ)

3. We note that the inverse of Θ is linear since the inverse of a linear bijective function is always linear.

The next theorem shows that in a Lie group, all left invariant vector fields are complete.

Lemma 10.15:

Let G be a Lie group, let 𝐕𝔤 and let Φ𝐕 be the flow of 𝐕. Then for all gG and all (x,h) in the domain of Φ𝐕, we have:

Φ𝐕(x,g*h)=h*Φ𝐕(x,g)

Proof:

Let hG be arbitrary, and let <mat>I_h</math> be the unique largest interval such that 0Ih and there exists a unique integral curve γh:IhM such that

γh

Template:TextBox

Proof:

Let gG be arbitrary and let γg be an integral curve at g.

The exponential function

Template:TextBox

The adjoint function

For the next definition, we recall that the automorphism group of a group was given by the set of group isomorphisms from the group to itself with composition as the group operation. Indeed, this is a group (see exercise 3).

We further recall that for a group G, the automorphism group is denoted by Aut(G).

Template:TextBox

Theorem 10.19:

Let G be a manifold of class 𝒞n, where n0{}. For each gG, Ad(g) is of class 𝒞n.

Proof:

We have:

Ad(g)=LgRg1

Therefore, the claim follows from theorems 2.29 and 10.11.

Template:TextBox

Exercises

  1. Let X,Y,Z,W be sets f:XZ and g:YW be two bijective functions. Prove that f×g is bijective.
  2. Prove lemma 10.5.
  3. Let G be a group and Aut(G) be the set of group isomorphisms from G to G. Prove that Aut(G) together with the composition as operation is a group.

Sources

Template:Navigation