Differentiable Manifolds/Product manifolds and Lie groups

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Navigation

The product manifold

Template:TextBox

Template:TextBox

Lemma 10.3:

Let Oℝ2d be open. Then for each (x,y)O, there exists ϵ(x,y)>0 such that

Bϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y)O

Proof:

Let (x,y)O be arbitrary. We choose δ>0 such that Bδ((x,y))O. Then we define ϵ(x,y):=δ2. Then, by the triangle inequality we have for every (z,w)Bϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y):

(z,w)(x,y)=(z,0)+(0,w)(x,0)(0,y)(z,0)(x,0)+(0,w)(0,y)=zx+wy<2ϵ(x,y)=δ

Therefore, (z,w)Bδ((x,y))O, and since (z,w)Bϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y) was arbitrary:

Bϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y)O

Lemma 10.4:

Let O,Uℝd be open sets. Then O×U is open in ℝ2d.

Proof:

Due to the openness of O and U for each point (x,y) in O×U, we find ϵ1,ϵ2ℝ>0 such that Bϵ1(x)O and Bϵ2(x)U. If we define ϵ:=min{ϵ1,ϵ2}, we have for all (z,w)Bϵ((x,y)):

xz2=(x,y)(z,w)2yw2(x,y)(z,w)2

and

yw2=(x,y)(z,w)2xz2(x,y)(z,w)2

and since the function is monotonely increasing on [0,), it follows

xz<ϵ

and

yw<ϵ

and thus:

(z,w)O×U

Lemma 10.5: Let X,Y,Z,W be sets and let f:XZ and g:YW be functions. If AZ and BW, then

(f×g)1(A×B)=f1(A)×g1(B)

Proof: See exercise 2.

Theorem 10.6: The product manifold of a manifold M of class π’žn, where nβ„•0{} with atlas {(Oυ,ϕυ)|υΥ} really is a manifold; i. e. {(Oυ×Oo,ϕυ×ϕo)|υ,oΥ} really is an atlas of class π’žn.

Proof:

1. We show that for all υ,oΥ the set (ϕυ×ϕo)(Oυ×Oo) is open.

We have:

(ϕυ×ϕo)(Oυ×Oo)={(ϕυ(p),ϕo(q))ℝ2d|pOυ,qOo}=ϕυ(Oυ)×ϕo(Oo)

This set is open in ℝ2d due to lemma 10.4, since it is the cartesian product of two open sets.

2. We prove that for all υ,oΥ, the function ϕυ×ϕo is a homeomorphism.

2.1. For bijectivity, see exercise 1.

2.2. We prove continuity.

Let O(ϕυ×ϕo)(Oυ×Oo) be open. Due to the definition of the subspace topology,

Lemma 10.4 implies that we have

O=(x,y)OBϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y)

(this equation can be proven by showing '' and '') and thus follows with lemma 10.5, that:

(ϕυ×ϕo)1(O)=(ϕυ×ϕo)1((x,y)OBϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y))=(x,y)O(ϕυ×ϕo)1(Bϵ(x,y)(x)×Bϵ(x,y)(y))=(x,y)Oϕυ1(Bϵ(x,y)(x))×(ϕo)1(Bϵ(x,y)(y))

, which is open as the union of open sets (since we had equipped M×M with the product topology).

2.3. We prove continuity of the inverse.

Let OM×M be open.

3. We prove that

Lie groups

Template:TextBox

Template:TextBox

Template:TextBox

Template:TextBox

Theorem 10.11: Let G be a d-dimensional Lie group of class π’žn. Then for each gG the respective left multiplication function and the respective right multiplication are diffeomorphisms of class π’žn from G to itself.

Proof:

We only prove the claim for the left multiplication. The proof for the right multiplication goes the same way.

In this proof, the group operation of G is denoted by *.

1. We show that Lg is differentiable of class π’žn.

Let gG be arbitrary. Since G is a Lie group, the function

ψ*:G×GG,ψ*(g,h)=g*h

is differentiable of class π’žn, where G×G is equipped with the product manifold structure.

Let now (O,ϕ) and (U,θ) be two arbitrary elements in the atlas of G. We choose (V,χ) in the atlas of G such that gV. As ψ* is differentiable of class π’žn, the function

ϕ|*(ψ*1(O)V×U)ψ*|ψ*1(O)V×U(χ×θ)|ψ*1(O)V×U1

is contained in π’žn(ℝ2d,ℝd). Therefore, also the function

f:ℝdℝd,f(x)=ϕ|ψ*(ψ*1(O)V×U)ψ*|ψ*1(O)V×U(χ×θ)|ψ*1(O)V×U1(χ1(g),x)

is contained in π’žn(ℝ2d,ℝd); the partial derivatives exist and are equal to the partial derivatives of the last d variables of the function

ϕ|ψ*(ψ*1(O)V×U)ψ*|ψ*1(O)V×U(χ×θ)|ψ*1(O)V×U1

. But we have for all xθ(Lg1(O)U):

f(x)=(ϕ|Lg(|Lg1(O)U)Lg|Lg1(O)Uθ|Lg1(O)U1)(x)

and therefore the function

ϕ|Lg(|Lg1(O)U)Lg|Lg1(O)Uθ|Lg1(O)U1

is contained in π’žn(ℝd,ℝd, which means the definition of differentiability of class π’žn is fulfilled.

2. We show that Lg is bijective.

We do so by noticing that an inverse function of Lg is given by Lg1: For arbitrary hG, we have:

Lg1(Lg(h))=g*(g1*h)=(g*g1)*h=e*h=h

and

Lg(Lg1(h))=g1*(g*h)=(g1*g)*h=e*h=h

3. We note that the inverse function is differentiable of class π’žn:

We use 1. with g1; g1 also is an element of G, and 1. proved that the left multiplication function is differentiable for every element of G, including g1.

Left invariant vector fields

Template:TextBox

Let us repeat the definition of a Lie subalgebra:

Definition 6.2:

Let L with [,] be a Lie algebra. A subset of L which is a Lie algebra with the restriction of [,] on that subset is called a Lie subalgebra.

Template:TextBox

Proof:

Let 𝐕,𝐖𝔀. It suffices to show that [𝐕,𝐖]𝔀, because then 𝔀 is a Lie algebra with the restriction of the vector field Lie bracket.

Indeed, we have for all g,hG and φπ’žn(G):

(dLg)h([𝐕,𝐖](h))(φ)=[𝐕,𝐖](h)(Lg*φ)=𝐕(h)(𝐖(Lg*φ))𝐖(h)(𝐕(Lg*φ))=𝐕(h)((dLg)(𝐖φ))𝐖(h)((dLg)(𝐕φ))=𝐕(h)(𝐖(g)(φ))𝐖(h)(𝐕(g)(φ))=𝐕(h)(𝐖φLg)𝐖(h)(𝐕φLg)=𝐕(h)(Lg*(𝐖φ))𝐖(h)(Lg*(𝐕φLg))=(dLg)h(𝐕(h))(𝐖φ)(dLg)h(𝐖(h))(𝐕φ)=𝐕(gh)(𝐖φ)𝐖(gh)(𝐕φ)=[𝐕,𝐖](gh)(φ)

, where by (dLg)(𝐖φ) the function

p(dLg)p(𝐖φ)

is meant and by 𝐖(g)(φ) the function

p𝐖(gp)(φ)

is meant (as both are equal to 𝐖(Lg*φ), both are differentiable of class π’žn).

Template:TextBox

Proof:

We choose the function

Θ:𝔀TeG,Θ(𝐕):=𝐕(e)

We will now show that this function is the desired isomorphism.

1. We prove linearity: Let 𝐕,𝐖𝔀 and cℝ. We have:

Θ(𝐕+c𝐖)=(𝐕+c𝐖)(e)=𝐕(e)+c𝐖(e)=Θ(𝐕)+cΘ(𝐖)

2. We prove bijectivity.

2.1. We prove injectivity.

Let Θ(𝐕)=Θ(𝐖) (i. e. 𝐕(e)=𝐖(e)) for 𝐕,𝐖𝔀. Since 𝐕,𝐖 are left invariant, it follows for all gG and φπ’žn, that

𝐕(g)(φ)=𝐕(ge)(φ)=(dLg)e(𝐕)(φ)=𝐕(e)(Lg*(φ))=𝐖(e)(Lg*(φ))=(dLg)e(𝐖)(φ)=𝐖(ge)(φ)=𝐖(g)(φ)

2.2. We prove surjectivity.

Let 𝐕eTeG be arbitrary. We define

𝐔𝐕e(g):=(dLg)e𝐕e

Due to theorem 2.19, this is a vector field. It is also left invariant because for all g,hG and φπ’žn(M), we have:

(dLg)h(𝐔𝐕e(h))(φ)=𝐔𝐕e(h)(Lg*(φ))=(dLh)e𝐕e(Lg*(φ))=𝐕e(Lh*(Lg*(φ)))=𝐕e(φLgLh)=𝐕e(φLgh)=(dLgh)e𝐕e(φ)=𝐔𝐕e(gh)(φ)

Further, we have for all φπ’žn(M):

Θ(𝐔𝐕e)(φ)=𝐔𝐕e(e)(φ)=(dLe)e𝐕e(φ)=𝐕e(φ)

3. We note that the inverse of Θ is linear since the inverse of a linear bijective function is always linear.

The next theorem shows that in a Lie group, all left invariant vector fields are complete.

Lemma 10.15:

Let G be a Lie group, let 𝐕𝔀 and let Φ𝐕 be the flow of 𝐕. Then for all gG and all (x,h) in the domain of Φ𝐕, we have:

Φ𝐕(x,g*h)=h*Φ𝐕(x,g)

Proof:

Let hG be arbitrary, and let <mat>I_h</math> be the unique largest interval such that 0Ih and there exists a unique integral curve γh:IhM such that

γh

Template:TextBox

Proof:

Let gG be arbitrary and let γg be an integral curve at g.

The exponential function

Template:TextBox

The adjoint function

For the next definition, we recall that the automorphism group of a group was given by the set of group isomorphisms from the group to itself with composition as the group operation. Indeed, this is a group (see exercise 3).

We further recall that for a group G, the automorphism group is denoted by Aut(G).

Template:TextBox

Theorem 10.19:

Let G be a manifold of class π’žn, where nβ„•0{}. For each gG, Ad(g) is of class π’žn.

Proof:

We have:

Ad(g)=LgRg1

Therefore, the claim follows from theorems 2.29 and 10.11.

Template:TextBox

Exercises

  1. Let X,Y,Z,W be sets f:XZ and g:YW be two bijective functions. Prove that f×g is bijective.
  2. Prove lemma 10.5.
  3. Let G be a group and Aut(G) be the set of group isomorphisms from G to G. Prove that Aut(G) together with the composition as operation is a group.

Sources

Template:Navigation