Commutative Algebra/Kernels, cokernels, products, coproducts
Kernels
Note that here, we don't see kernels only as subsets, but rather as an object together with a morphism. This is because in the category of groups, for example, we can take the morphism just by inclusion. Let me explain.
Example 3.2:
In the category of groups, every morphism has a kernel.
Proof:
Let be groups and a morphism (that is, a group homomorphism). We set
and
- ,
the inclusion. This is indeed a kernel in the category of groups. For, if is a group homomorphism such that , then maps wholly to , and we may simply write . This is also clearly a unique factorisation.
For kernels the following theorem holds:
Proof:
Let . The situation is depicted in the following picture:
Here, the three lower arrows depict the general property of the kernel. Now the morphisms and are both factorisations of the morphism over . By uniqueness in factorisations, .
Kernels are essentially unique:
Proof:
From the first property of kernels, we obtain and . Hence, the second property of kernels imply the commutative diagrams
We claim that and are inverse to each other.
- and .
Since both and are monic by theorem 3.3, we may cancel them to obtain
- and ,
that is, we have inverse arrows and thus, by definition, isomorphisms.
Cokernels
An analogous notion is that of a cokernel. This notion is actually common in mathematics, but not so much at the undergraduate level.
Again, this notion is just a generalisation of facts observed in "everyday" categories. Our first example of cokernels shall be the existence of cokernels in Abelian groups. Now actually, cokernels exist even in the category of groups, but the construction is a bit tricky since in general, the image need not be a normal subgroup, which is why we may not be able to form the factor group by the image. In Abelian groups though, all subgroups are normal, and hence this is possible.
Example 3.6:
In the category of Abelian groups, every morphism has a cokernel.
Proof:
Let be any two Abelian groups, and let be a group homomorphism. We set
- ;
we may form this quotient group because within an Abelian group, all subgroups are normal. Further, we set
- ,
the projection (we adhere to the custom of writing Abelian groups in an additive fashion). Let now be a group homomorphism such that , where is another Abelian group. Then the function
is well-defined (because of the rules for group morphisms) and the desired unique factorisation of is given by .
Proof:
Let be a morphism and a corresponding cokernel. Assume that . The situation is depicted in the following picture:
Now again, , and and are by their equality both factorisations of . Hence, by the uniqueness of such factorisations required in the definition of cokernels, .
Proof:
Once again, we have and , and hence we obtain commutative diagrams
We once again claim that and are inverse to each other. Indeed, we obtain the equations
- and
and by cancellation (both and are epis due to theorem 8.7) we obtain
- and
and hence the theorem.
Interplay between kernels and cokernels
Proof:
means
We set , that is,
In particular, since , there exists a unique such that . We now want that is a kernel of , that is,
Hence assume . Then . Hence, by the topmost diagram (in this proof), for a unique , which is exactly what we want. Further, follows from the second diagram of this proof.
Proof:
The statement that is the cokernel of reads
We set , that is
In particular, since , for a suitable unique morphism . We now want to be a cokernel of , that is,
Let thus . Then also and hence has a unique factorisation by the topmost diagram.
The equation
is to be read "the kernel of is a kernel of any cokernel of itself", and the same for the other equation with kernels replaced by cokernels and vice versa.
Proof:
is a morphism which is some kernel. Hence, by theorem 3.9
(where the equation is to be read " is a kernel of any cokernel of "). Similarly, from theorem 3.10
- ,
where .
Products
Example 3.13:
Coproducts
Example 3.17:
Biproducts
Example 3.21:
Within the category of Abelian groups, a biproduct is given by the product group; if are Abelian groups, set the product group of and to be
- ,
the cartesian product, with component-wise group operation.
Proof: