Commutative Algebra/Radicals, strong Nakayama
Radicals of ideals
Proof:
For , note that . For , assume for no . Form the quotient ring . By theorem 12.3, pick a prime ideal disjoint from the multiplicatively closed set . Form the ideal . is a prime ideal which contains and does not intersect . Hence is not in the right hand side.
Proof:
Intersection of ideals is an ideal.
Proof:
Clearly, . Further from theorem 13.2; the last equality from .
The radicals of the zero ideal
Note that by definition
- ,
the set of nilpotent elements.
Proof:
Theorem 13.2.
We have .
If is a ring, is the set of units of .
Proof:
: Let , . Assume . Form the ideal ; by theorem 12.8 there exists maximal with , hence . If , then , contradiction.
: Assume for all and . Then there is a maximal ideal not containing . Hence and for a and an . Hence is not a unit.
Radicals and localisation
Proof:
Let , that is, . Then , , . There exists such that . Thus , whence and . Thus, .
Let . We may assume . Choose such that . Then , whence .
Strong Nakayama lemma
Exercises
- Prove that whenever is a reduced ring, then the canonical homomorphism is injective.