Correlated Gaussian method in Quantum Mechanics

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Split Template:TOCright Explicitly correlated Gaussian functions have been extensively used in quantum-mechanical variational calculations in atomic, molecular, and nuclear physics. This book is an attempt to collect the relevant information about this established tool in computational quantum mechanics.

Introduction

Often we describe bound-state and scattering problems in nuclear and atomic physics through the Shrödinger equation. Unfortunately modern quantum physics offers problems that we can not solve analytically. Luckily the availability of powerful computers is shifting the emphasis from the analytical computation of the solution toward numerical analysis. During the last century numerous methods were developed in order to approximate solutions numerically, e.g. Monte-Carlo simulation, Hypershperical expansion, variational methods with different trial wave functions etc.

In this section we discuss variational method with trial function in the form of correlated Gaussians which is widely used in the modern physics. Mathematically it is based on the Ritz theorem, that states that for an arbitrary function Ψ from the state space the expectation value of the Hamiltonian (<Ψ|H|Ψ>/<Ψ|Ψ>) is larger then the ground state energy. So choosing different trial wave functions and calculating mean values of the Hamiltonian for this functions allows us to get an upper bound for the ground state energy.

Example

To show the idea of the method we consider two particles in 1 dimension interacting through the oscillator potential

[122x1122x2+12(x1x2)2]ϕ=Eϕ.

It is really simple textbook problem with the ground state solution

ϕ0=(2π)1/4exp(122(x1x2)2),E0=12,

where we assumed for simplicity, that the total momentum is equal to zero.

To show how the method works we choose the trial wave function in the form of just one gaussian

ftr=(4απ)1/4exp(α(x1x2)2),

where we have only one real positive parameter which has to minimize the energy. The idea of the method is to pick this parameter stochastically using just generator of the real numbers. We find out that independently of the seed after 50 attempts we found value of α that gives the ground state energy with 5 significant digits.

Convergence of the expectation value of the Hamiltonian (different curves corresponds to different starting seeds for the generator of the random numbers).

Of course it's really simple example and we can establish energy with high precision just because we are working in the space that contains ground state wave function of the Hamiltonian.

In order to establish excited states it's not enough to use just one Gaussian so we pick trial wave function in more general form

ftr=i=1Nciexp(αi(x1x2si)2).

As above we pick parameters αi,si stochastically and then determine linear parameters ci demanding minimal expectation value of the Hamiltonian. Using N=25 and one random set of the parameters αi,si (we assume that 0<αi<5,1<si<1) we get first 6 eigenstates with 5 significant digits.

From this simple example we learn that we are able to approximate solution of the Schrödinger equation without any preliminary knowledge about the system using only random search. The main problem is to estimate how good this approximation is.

The method

Hamiltonian under consideration

We shall consider a non-relativistic quantum mechanical N-particle (N-body) system described by a Hamiltonian

H^=i=1N(22mi)2ri+i=1NVi(ri)+i<jNVij(rirj),

where mi and ri are the mass and the coordinate of particle number i; the first term is the kinetic energy operator; the second term is the one-body force, like the external field (often an oscillator, Vi(ri)=miω22ri2), for example Magneto-optical trap; and the third term is the two-body forces, the inter-particle interactions.

This Hamiltonian can describe a system of atoms in a trap or a nucleus.

In general one can also consider spin-dependent, three-body, non-local and other types of interactions which we shall introduce when needed.

Basis expansion of the Schrödinger equation

We are going to solve the Schrödinger equation

H^|ψ=ϵ|ψ,

where H^ is the Hamiltonian of a quantum few-body system, |ψ and ϵ are the eigenfunction and the eigenvalue to be found.

We shall expand the wave-function |ψ in terms of a set of basis functions |ii=1n,

|ψ=i=1nci|i.

Inserting the expansion into the Schrödinger equation and multiplying from the left with k|1kn gives

i=1nk|H^|ici=ϵi=1nk|ici.

Or, in the matrix notation

c=ϵ𝒩c,

where and 𝒩 are correspondingly the Hamiltonian and the overlap matrices with the matrix elements

ki=k|H^|i,𝒩ki=k|i.

The matrix equation c=ϵ𝒩c is called the generalized eigenvalue problem. There exist established routines to solve this problem, for example the function "eig" in Octave, or the function "gsl_eigen_gensymm" in the GNU Scientific Library.

If the basis function are orthogonal and normalized the overlap matrix equals the unity matrix, 𝒩ij=δij, and the generalized eigenvalue problem reduces to the ordinary eigenvalue problem, c=ϵc.

We shall use Gaussians --- which are not orthogonal --- as basis functions, therefore we shall deal with the generalized eigenvalue problem.

Gaussians as basis functions

We shall use the so-called Correlated Gaussians (or Explicitly Correlated Gaussians) as the basis functions. For a system of Nparticles with coordinates ri,i=1N, the Correlated Gaussian is defined as

g(r1,,rN)exp(i,j=1NAijrirj+i=1Nsiri),

where rirj denotes the dot-product of the two vectors; and where A, a symmetric positive-defined matrix, and si|i=1,,N, the shift-vectors, are (cleverly chosen) parameters of the Gaussian.

In matrix notation,

g(𝐫)exp(𝐫𝖳A𝐫+𝐬𝖳𝐫),

where 𝐫 is the column of the coordinates ri and 𝐬 is the column of the shift-vectors si,

𝐫(r1rN),𝐬(s1sN),

and

𝐫𝖳A𝐫+𝐬𝖳𝐫ijriAijrj+isiri.

Matrix elements with Gaussians

We represent the few-body wave-function Ψ(r1,,rN)as a linear combination of n correlated Gaussians,

Ψ(r1,,rN)=i=1ncigi(r1,,rN).

We shall discuss the choice of matrices A in these Gaussians later and here only calculate the matrix elements.

Overlap

The overlap,

g|gd3r1d3rNexp(𝐫𝖳(A+A)𝐫+(𝐬+𝐬)𝖳𝐫)d𝐫exp(𝐫𝖳B𝐫+𝐯𝖳𝐫),

(where d𝐫d3r1d3rN, BA+A and 𝐯𝐬+𝐬) can be calculated making an orthogonal transformation, 𝐫𝐱=Q𝖳𝐫, where Q𝖳Q=1, to the basis where the matrix B is diagonal,

g|g=d𝐱exp(𝐱𝖳B𝐱+𝐯𝖳𝐱)=d𝐱exp(i=1NxiBiixi+i=1Nvixi)=i=1Nd3xiexp(xiBiixi+vixi)=i=1Nexp(14Biivi2)(πBii)3/2=e14𝐯𝖳B1𝐯(πNdet(B))3/2.

Finally,

g|g=e14𝐯𝖳B1𝐯(πNdet(B))3/2,whereBA+Aand𝐯𝐬+𝐬.

Kinetic energy

Let us consider a more general form of the kinetic energy operator,

K^=i,j=1NriΛijrj𝐫Λ𝐫𝖳,

where Λ is a constant matrix, for example, for the Hamiltonian above Λij=22miδij.

The matrix element is given as

g|K^|g=d𝐫e𝐫𝖳A𝐫+𝐬'𝖳𝐫(i,j=1NriΛijrj)e𝐫𝖳A𝐫+𝐬𝖳𝐫.

Integrating by parts with respect to the left derivative gives

g|K^|g=d𝐫(𝐫e𝐫𝖳A𝐫+𝐬'𝖳𝐫)Λ(𝐫𝖳e𝐫𝖳A𝐫+𝐬𝖳𝐫)=d𝐫e𝐫𝖳B𝐫+𝐯𝖳𝐫(2𝐫𝖳A+𝐬'𝖳)Λ(2A𝐫+𝐬)=d𝐫e𝐫𝖳B𝐫+𝐯𝖳𝐫(4𝐫𝖳AΛA𝐫2𝐫𝖳AΛ𝐬2𝐬'𝖳ΛA𝐫+𝐬'𝖳Λ𝐬).

Calculating term after term,

d𝐫e𝐫𝖳B𝐫+𝐯𝖳𝐫𝐫𝖳F𝐫=𝐯F𝐯𝖳d𝐫e𝐫𝖳B𝐫+𝐯𝖳𝐫=(πNdet(B))3/2(𝐯F𝐯𝖳)e14𝐯𝖳B1𝐯=(32trace(FB1)+𝐮𝖳F𝐮)e14𝐯𝖳B1𝐯(πNdet(B))3/2,

d𝐫e𝐫𝖳B𝐫+𝐯𝖳𝐫𝐚𝖳𝐫=𝐚𝖳𝐯𝖳d𝐫e𝐫𝖳B𝐫+𝐯𝖳𝐫=(πNdet(B))3/2(𝐚𝖳𝐯𝖳)e14𝐯𝖳B1𝐯=(𝐚𝖳𝐮)e14𝐯𝖳B1𝐯(πNdet(B))3/2,

where 𝐮12B1𝐯.

Finally,

g|𝐫Λ𝐫𝖳|g=(6trace(AΛAB1)+(2A𝐮𝐬)𝖳Λ(2A𝐮𝐬))e12𝐯𝖳𝐮(πNdet(B))3/2,BA+A,𝐮12B1𝐯.

Potential energy

The matrix element of the interaction potential between, say, particles i and j,

g|V(rirj)|g,

can be written in a more general form,

g|V(w𝖳𝐫)|g,

where w is a size-N vector with all components equal zero except for wi=1 and wj=1.

A one-body interaction, V(ri), has the same form, V(wT𝐫), where wi=1 and all other components equal zero.

Central potential

For a central potential in a Gaussian form,

V(ri)Seαri2=Seα𝐫𝖳ww𝖳𝐫,wherewi=1,wki=0,

the matrix element between shifted Gaussians can be calculated straightforwardly,

g|eα𝐫𝖳ww𝖳𝐫|g=d𝐫e𝐫𝖳(B+αww𝖳)𝐫+𝐯𝖳𝐫=e14𝐯𝖳B'1𝐯(πNdet(B))3/2

where B=B+αww𝖳.

The rank-1 updates of the determinant, det(B+αww𝖳), and the matrix inverse, (B+αww𝖳)1, can be efficiently calculated using the following formulae,

det(B+uv𝖳)=(1+v𝖳B1u)det(B),

and (Sherman-Morrison)

(B+uvT)1=B1B1uvTB11+vTB1u.

For a general form-factor central potential one way to calculate the matrix element is through the Fourier transform of the potential, V(r)=d3k(2π)3𝔣(k)eikr,

g|V(w𝖳𝐫)|g=d3k(2π)3𝔣(k)d𝐫e𝐫𝖳B𝐫+(𝐯+ikw)𝖳𝐫=d3k(2π)3𝔣(k)e14(𝐯+ikw)𝖳B1(𝐯+ikw)(πNdet(B))3/2.

Thus

g|V(w𝖳𝐫)|g=e14𝐯𝖳B1𝐯(πNdet(B))3/2d3k(2π)3𝔣(k)eαk2+ikq,

where 𝔣(k) is the Fourier transform of the potential V(r), α14wTB1w and q12w𝖳B1𝐯.

The last integral can be also written via the potential itself,

d3k(2π)3𝔣(k)eαk2+ikq=d3k(2π)3d3rV(r)eαk2ik(rq)=d3rV(r)e(rq)24αd3k(2π)3eα(k+irq2α)2=d3rV(r)e(rq)24απ3/2(2π)3α3/2=(14απ)3/2d3rV(r)e(rq)24α=(βπ)3/2d3rV(r)eβ(rq)2,

where β14α=(wTB1w)1.

Finally,

g|V(w𝖳𝐫)|g=e14𝐯𝖳B1𝐯(πNdet(B))3/2(βπ)3/2d3rV(r)eβ(rq)2,

where β=(wTB1w)1 and q12w𝖳B1𝐯.

Here are integrals for some popular potentials,

  • Gaussian,d3reγr2eβ(rq)2=eγβγ+βq2(πγ+β)3/2;
  • Coulomb, d3r1reβ(rq)2=2π0rdr11dcosθeβr2+2βrqcosθβq2=2πβ12q0dr(eβ(rq)2eβ(r+q)2)=2πβπ2erf(βq)βq;
  • Oscillator, d3rr2eβ(rq)2=β5/2d3x(x+βq)2ex2=π3/2β5/2(32+βq2).
Tensor potential

In nuclear physics the tensor potential between two nucleons has the form

V^𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋=f(r)(σ1r)(σ2r)

where f(r) is the form-factor; r=r1r2; r1 and r2 are the coordinates of the nucleons; σ1, σ2 are the Pauli matrices related to the spins, s1 and s1, of the two nucleons: s1=12σ1, s2=12σ2.

One often adds the term f(r)13σ1σ2 to make sure that the potential has no central component (that is, the average of the potential over all directions is zero). Without this extra term the above tensor potential has a central spin-spin component 13f(r)(σ1σ2).

Again introducing the column w with w1=1, w2=1, wi1,2=0, and the vector-columns 𝐚=σ1w, 𝐛=σ2w, the potential can be written in a convenient general form,

V^𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋=f(w𝖳𝐫)(𝐚𝖳𝐫)(𝐛𝖳𝐫)

The matrix element of this operator between shifted Gaussians is given as

g|V^𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋|g=d𝐫e𝐫𝖳B𝐫𝐯𝖳𝐫f(w𝖳𝐫)(𝐚𝖳𝐫)(𝐛𝖳𝐫)=(𝐚𝖳𝐯𝖳)(𝐛𝖳𝐯𝖳)d𝐫e𝐫𝖳B𝐫𝐯𝖳𝐫f(w𝖳𝐫).

This can be calculated analytically for a Gaussian form-factor, f(w𝖳𝐫)=eγ𝐫𝖳ww𝖳𝐫,

(𝐚𝖳𝐯𝖳)(𝐛𝖳𝐯𝖳)d𝐫e𝐫𝖳B𝐫𝐯𝖳𝐫eγ𝐫𝖳ww𝖳𝐫=(𝐚𝖳𝐯𝖳)(𝐛𝖳𝐯𝖳)e14𝐯𝖳B'1𝐯(πNdet(B))3/2=(12𝐚𝖳B'1𝐛+14(𝐚𝖳B'1𝐯)(𝐛𝖳B'1𝐯))e14𝐯𝖳B'1𝐯(πNdet(B))3/2,

where B=B+γww𝖳.

Finally, for a Gaussian tensor potential,

g|eγ𝐫𝖳ww𝖳𝐫(𝐚𝖳𝐫)(𝐛𝖳𝐫)|g=(12𝐚𝖳B'1𝐛+14(𝐚𝖳B'1𝐯)(𝐛𝖳B'1𝐯))e14𝐯𝖳B'1𝐯(πNdet(B))3/2,

where B=B+γww𝖳.

Spin-orbit potential

The spin-orbit potential between two nucleons --- with coordinates r1 and r2 and spins 12σ1 and 12σ2 --- is usually written in the form

V𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖻𝗂𝗍=f(r)(SL)

where r=r1r2; S is the total spin of the two nucleons,

S=12(σ1+σ2),

and L is the relative orbital momentum between the two nucleons

L=(r1r2)×i2(r1r2).

where × denotes vector-product of two vectors.

The orbital momentum can be rewritten --- using the column w with w1=1, w2=1, wi1,2=0 --- in a convenient general form,

L=i2(w𝖳𝐫×w𝖳𝐫𝖳).

For a Gaussian form-factor, f(w𝖳𝐫)=exp(γ𝐫𝖳ww𝖳𝐫), the corresponding matrix element between shifted Gaussians can be calculated analytically,

g|eγ𝐫𝖳ww𝖳𝐫(w𝖳𝐫×w𝖳𝐫𝖳)|g=d𝐫eγ𝐫𝖳ww𝖳𝐫e𝐫𝖳A𝐫+𝐬'𝖳𝐫(w𝖳𝐫×w𝖳𝐫𝖳)e𝐫𝖳A𝐫+𝐬𝖳𝐫=(w𝖳𝐬'𝖳)×(w𝖳𝐬2w𝖳A𝐬𝖳)e14𝐯𝖳B'1𝐯(πNdet(B))3/2=(12w𝖳B'1𝐯)×(w𝖳𝐬w𝖳AB'1𝐯)e14𝐯𝖳B'1𝐯(πNdet(B))3/2.

where B=A+A, 𝐯=𝐬+𝐬, B=B+γww𝖳.

Mathematical formulation for the ground state problem

Let us consider a time-independent physical system whose Hamiltonian H is Hermitian and bounded from below. We want to approximate the discrete eigenvalues of H and its wave functions

HΨn=EnΨn,

where we ordered eigenvalues s.t.E0<E1<....

It means that we would like to find such square integrable functions fi, that (HEi)fi|(HEi)fi𝑒𝑝𝑠×Ei2fi|fi, with some 𝑒𝑝𝑠𝐑. Unfortunately in practice we don't know exact eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian, so first we have to find approximation to the energy Ei. The following theorem gives us the receipt. Here we would like to restrict ourselves to the ground state, but using the Min-max theorem one can extend to the whole discrete spectrum of the Hamiltonian

Theorem

The expectation value of the Hamiltonian for any ϕ from the state space is equal or larger then the ground state energy E0.

Proof

Apparently the function ϕ can be decomposed in the orthogonal basis Ψn: ϕ=aiΨi. With this decomposition we write the mean value of the Hamiltonian: E[ϕ]=<ϕ|H|ϕ><ϕ|ϕ>=i|ai|2Eii|ai|2, from which follows that E[ϕ]=E0+i|ai|2(EiE0)i|ai|2E0.

This statement is often called Ritz theorem and might be seen as a corollary of the Min-max theorem.

This result allows us compute an upper bound for the ground state energy.

The following theorem according to Weinstein allows us to rewrite our initial demand that (HEi)fi|(HEi)fi𝑒𝑝𝑠×Ei2fi|fi in terms of the variance σ2[ϕ]=<ϕ|(HE)2|ϕ><ϕ|ϕ>

Theorem

There exist at least one eigenvalue in the interval [E[ϕ]σ[ϕ],E[ϕ]+σ[ϕ]] .

Proof

We write ϕ in the Ψn basis, and get σ2[ϕ]=i|ai|2(EiE)2i|ai|2. There exist integer k, s.t. (EkE)2<(EiE)2,ik. With this we rewrite variance σ2[ϕ]=(EkE)2+i|ai|2((EiE)2(EkE)2)i|ai|2(EkE)2.

This result might be useful if and only if the lower bound can be calculated as close as possible to the ground state energy.

With these theorems we see the way to proceed:

1. Take convenient basis in the state space of the Hamiltonian.

2. Cut the basis size to some finite number.

3. Minimise expectation value of the Hamiltonian in this basis.

4. Enlarge basis and do step 3.

5. Do steps 3,4 as long as needed to insure convergence of the ground state energy.

6. Calculate variance.

7. If variance is larger than some precision value than enlarge basis size and do 3,4,5,6 again, otherwise we are done.

In practice steps 3,4,5 alone can give accurate value of energy. Steps 6,7 are needed for approximation of the wave function. This is due to the following theorem

Theorem

The expectation value of the Hamiltonian is stationary in the neighbourhood of the discrete eigenvalues.

Proof

So in general it is easier to get accurate approximation to the energy than to other observables.

Basis

We want to start with the first step: take some convenient basis. We would like to define convenient for our problem

1. Simple transformation from one system of coordinates to another.

2. Possibility to eliminate the centre of mass.

3. Easy computations for the overlap and kinetic energy.

Coordinates

It is of advantage to introduce rescaled coordinates,

𝐪i=mim𝐫i,

where m is a conveniently chosen mass scale. Indeed the kinetic energy T and the harmonic trap Vh have a more symmetric form in the rescaled coordinates,

T=22mi𝐪i2,Vh=mω22i=1N𝐪i2.

The Jacobian of the transformation from 𝐫 to 𝐪 is equal

(𝐪1,,𝐪N)(𝐫1,,𝐫N)=i=1N(mim)3/2.

A further suitable linear transformation to a new set of coordinates is possible,

𝐱i=j=1NUij𝐪j,

or, in matrix notation,

𝐱=U𝐪,

where U is the transformation matrix.

If the transformation matrix is unitary, UTU=1, the diagonal form of the kinetic energy and the harmonic trap is preserved in the new coordinates,

T=22mi𝐱i2,Vh=mω22i=1N𝐱i2.

Last transformation is of particular use if new system has the coordinate

𝐱𝐍i𝐫𝐢,

which can be seen as a center of mass coordinate. It allows us to work with a wave function in the form

Ψ(𝐫𝟏,𝐫𝟐,...,𝐫𝐍)=Φ(𝐱𝟏,𝐱𝟐,...,𝐱𝐍𝟏)ϕ(𝐱𝐍),

where ϕ(𝐱𝐍) is the ground state wave function for the oscillator potential.

Correlated Gaussians General Case

First we consider trial wave function in the basis of completely general shifted Gaussian, which can be used to describe a system in the external field with anisotropic inter-particle interaction

|ϕ=k=1KCk|A(k),s(k);x

where

|A,s;x=exp(i,j=1D*nAij(xisi)(xjsj))e(xs)TA(xs),

A, a symmetric positive-defined matrix, and s, a shift vector, are the non-linear parameters of the Gaussian and n=N-1. With this definition we have K(12D*n(D*n+1)+D*n) non-linear variational parameters. To find those one can use deterministic methods (e.g. Powell's method) or methods based on a stochastic search. We use latter approach though we find K linear variational parameters through a full minimization with respect to a given set of non-linear parameters.

Matrix elements

The matix elements can be determined analytically either by diagonalizing the matrix B or Cholesky decompose B=LLT (since it is positive definite) and change basis to coordinates where the matrix is either diagonal or unit. This way many integrals can be determined by iterative integration.

Overlap

Correlated Gaussians are generally non-orthogonal and the overlap is therefore non-diagonal,

NA,s;x|A,s;x=dDx1dDxne(xs)TA(xs)(xs)TA(xs)=πD*n2detBe(sTAss'TAs+14vTB1v).

where we defined B=A+A,v=2As+2As

Kinetic energy

Here we calculate kinetic energy

A,s;x|xTΛx|A,s;x=N×(2tr(AΛAB1)+4uTAΛAu4uT(AΛAs+AΛAs)+4s'TAΛAs)

where we defined u=12B1v for Λ=12I with I to be the identity matrix, one can get simpler expression after noticing that

12xTx|A,s;x=(trA2(xs)TAA(xs))|A,s;x

To proceed one has to derive the following identities:

A,s;x|(aTx)|A,s;x=N×(aTu),
A,s;x|(xTFx)|A,s;x=N×(uTFu+12tr(FB1)).

To calculate

A,s;x|(12xTx)(12xTx)|A,s;x

which we need to calculate variance we have to calculate the following matrix element

A,s;x|(xTDx)(xTD1x)|A,s;x=N×([uTDu][uTD1u]+12[uTD1u]tr(DB1)+12[uTDu]tr(D1B1)+2uTDB1D1u+14tr(DB1)tr(D1B1)+tr(DB1D1B1)),

Potential energy

Here we calculate matrix element

A,s;x|V|A,s;x=i<jNdDx1dDxnVije(xs)TA(xs)(xs)TA(xs).

In general we can not write analytical expression for this integral, but we can reduce it to D dimensional integrals. For example, consider just one term from the sum

I=dDx1dDxnVije(xs)TA(xs)(xs)TA(xs),

to simplify this integral we have to make transformation from Jacobi set (𝐱𝟏,𝐱𝟐,...,𝐱𝐧) , where matrices A,A',s,s' are defined to the Jacobi set (𝐲𝟏,𝐲𝟐,...,𝐲𝐧), where 𝐲𝟏=𝐫𝐢𝐫𝐣. transformation between those sets are provided through the orthogonal matrix U: x=Uy. With this we write

I=dDy1dDynVij(𝐲𝟏)e(yUTs)TUTAU(yUTs)(yUTs)TUTAU(yUTs)=dDy1Vij(𝐲𝟏)f(𝐲𝟏),

where

f(𝐲𝟏)=dDy2dDyne(yUTs)TUTAU(yUTs)(yUTs)TUTAU(yUTs),

can be found analytically.

If we can write potential as a sum of Gaussians Vij(𝐲𝟏)=kckea,b=1a,b=D(yauak)TFabk(ybubk) then the integral I can be found analytically in the same way as we found overlap.

Central

Coulomb

Particles with spin

To consider particles with spin we add spin part to the trial wave function

|ϕ=k=1KCk|A(k),s(k);xχk

where for particles with spin = 1/2 function χk is just an array of N elements. Each element is an eigenfunction of the spin's projection on the predefined axis. For example χk=|12,12,...,12> defines the system with all particles have spin in the same direction. Next we define the spin operator 𝐬(𝐢) that acts on the particle number i in the following way

<±12|sz(i)|±12>=±12
<±12|sx(i)|12>=12
<±12|sy(i)|12>=𝐢2

and zero otherwise.

Spin-orbit

Here we discuss spin-orbit potential of the form Vij,LS=V(|𝐫𝐢𝐫𝐣|)𝐋(𝐢𝐣)𝐒(𝐢𝐣), where 𝐒(𝐢𝐣)=𝐬(𝐢)+𝐬(𝐣) and Lk(ij)=𝐢l,m=1l,m=Deklmylym - relative angular momentum, where eklm - Levi-Chevita symbol, and 𝐲=𝐫𝐢𝐫𝐣. We have to calculate following matrix element

Ik=A,s;x|V(y)eklmylym|A,s;x

again we are making transformation from the Jacobi set (𝐱𝟏,...,𝐱𝐧) to the Jacobi set (𝐲𝟏=𝐲,...,𝐲𝐧) using a transformation matrix U: x=Uy.

Ik=dDy1dDynV(𝐲𝟏)eklmyl(2(UTAU)jm(yUTs)j)e(yUTs)TUTAU(yUTs)(yUTs)TUTAU(yUTs),0<jn*D,0<k,l,mD,

Correlated Gaussians with Super Vectors

In the previous section we considered completely general setup, which is suitable for any inter-particle potentials and external fields. This approach is far from optimal if for example we are interested in ground state of N bosons with isotropic pairwise interaction, because in this case we know that our ground state must have zero orbital momentum, with this in mind we write the trial wave function in the smaller variational basis:

|ϕ=k=1KCk|A(k),𝐬(𝐤);x

where

|A,𝐬;x=exp(i,j=1nAij(𝐱𝐢𝐬𝐢)(𝐱𝐣𝐬𝐣))e(𝐱𝐬)TA(𝐱𝐬).

If we put shift vectors to be zeros 𝐬𝐢=0,𝐬𝐣=0, then the trial wave function treats Cartesian components of vectors 𝐱 equivalently, which leads to zero angular momentum, otherwise the wave function will contain all possible angular momentum and we need an effective procedure to build an eigenstate for a given angular momentum. Matrix elements for this trial wave functions can be obtained from the general case, but we write it explicitly.

Matrix Elements

Overlap

NA,𝐬;x|A,𝐬;x=dDx1dDxne(𝐱𝐬)TA(𝐱𝐬)(𝐱𝐬)TA(𝐱𝐬)=(πndetB)D2e(𝐬TA𝐬𝐬TA𝐬+14𝐯TB1𝐯).

where we defined B=A+A,𝐯=2A𝐬+2A𝐬

Kinetic energy

A,𝐬;x|xTΛx|A,𝐬;x=N×(2Dtr(AΛAB1)+4𝐮TAΛA𝐮4𝐮T(AΛA𝐬+AΛA𝐬)+4𝐬TAΛA𝐬)=N×(2Dtr(AΛAB1)+4(𝐮𝐬)TAΛA(𝐮𝐬))

where we defined 𝐮=12B1𝐯

Angular momentum

We consider the matrix element of the operator O=i,j=1i,j=naibj[𝐱𝐢×𝐱𝐣][a𝐱×b𝐱], choice of a,b can give the total angular momentum or an angular momentum for appropriate relative coordinate.

First we calculate matrix elements of the form

A,𝐬;x|a𝐱|A,𝐬;x=N(a𝐮)
A,𝐬;x|[a𝐱×b𝐱]|A,𝐬;x=N(a𝐮×b𝐮)

and now we can calculate matrix element for operator O

A,𝐬;x|[a𝐱×b𝐱]|A,𝐬;x=2A,𝐬;x|[a𝐱×bA𝐱]|A,𝐬;x+2A,𝐬;x|[a𝐱×bA𝐬]|A,𝐬;x=2N[a𝐮×bA(𝐬𝐮)].

We define total angular momentum to be 𝐋iN(𝐫i×𝐩i). If we make transformation to the Jacobi set, than we obtain 𝐋=iN(𝐱i×𝐏i), where 𝐏i is the linear momentum corresponding to the i coordinate. So if we assume that the system as a whole is at rest s.t. 𝐏N=0 than the following matrix element defines total angular momentum

<L2>=2i=1nk=1nA,𝐬;x|(𝐱i×𝐱i)(𝐱k×𝐱k)|A,𝐬;x=2i=1nk=1nA,𝐬;x|(𝐱i×𝐱i)(𝐱k×𝐱k)|A,𝐬;x

After simplification (first we rotate to the set of coordinate, where matrix A takes a diagonal form, than we rotate back and rotate to the set where matrix A takes a diagonal form, and again rotate back) we obtain

<L2>=42i,m,k,l=1nA,𝐬;x|Aim(𝐱i×𝐬m)Akl(𝐱k×𝐬l)|A,𝐬;x

We take the following integral

A,𝐬;x|xmlxkf|A,𝐬;x=N(12(B1)kmδfl+14(B1)kcvcf(B1)mnvnl);l,f=1,2,3;m,k=1,2,...,n

where δfl - is a Kronecker delta.

With this we write total angular momentum

<L2>=42N(𝐬TAB1A𝐬+14k,c(AB1)kc[𝐯k×𝐬c]a,b(AB1)ab[𝐯a×𝐬b])

Tensor

Appendix A: some integrals with 3D Gaussians

Not-shifted

+d3xeβx2=(πβ)3/2

+d3xeβx2x2=321β(πβ)3/2

+d3xeβx2(ax)(bx)=(ab)13+d3xeβx2x2=(ab)12β(πβ)3/2

+d3xeβx2(ax)(bx)x2=(ab)13+d3xeβx2=(ab)13(πβ)3/2

+d3xeβx2(3(ax)(bx)x2(ab))=0

+d3xeβx2(x2)2=154π3/2β7/2

+d3xeβx2(x2)3=1058π3/2β9/2


+d3xeαx2eαx2=(πα+α)3/2

+d3xeαx2x2eαx2=321α+α(πα+α)3/2

+d3xeαx2(2x2)eαx2=6ααα+α(πα+α)3/2


n-body

+d3x1d3xnexp(i=1nαixi2)exp(i=1nαixi2)=(πni=1n(αi+αi))3/2

+d3x1d3xnexp(ijxiAijxj)exp(ijxiAijxj)=(πndet(B))3/2,B=A+A

+d3x1d3xnexp(ijxiAijxj)ijxiFijxjexp(ijxiAijxj)=(πndet(B))3/232trace(FB1),B=A+A

+d3x1d3xnexp(ijxiAijxj)ij(xiΛijxj)exp(ijxiAijxj)=(πndet(B))3/26trace(AΛAB1),B=A+A

Shifted

u12β1v,

+d3xeβx2+vx=e14v2β(πβ)3/2

+d3xeβx2+vxax=(av)e14v2β(πβ)3/2=12β(av)e14v2β(πβ)3/2=(au)e14v2β(πβ)3/2,

+d3xeβx2+vx(ax)(bx)=(av)(bv)e14v2β(πβ)3/2=(12β(ab)+14β2(av)(bv))e14v2β(πβ)3/2

+d3xeβx2+vxx2=(321β+u2)e14v2β(πβ)3/2


Here we need to indroduce a notation to simplify the expressions:

x~(x1xn),(x~)i=xi,(Bx~)ijBijxj,(x~TB)ijxjBji,v~Tx~i=1nvixi.

dx~d3x1d3xn.


+dx~ex~TBx~+v~Tx~=e14v~TB1v~(πndet(B))3/2

+dx~ex~TBx~+v~Tx~(a~Tx~)=(a~Tv~T)e14v~TB1v~(πndet(B))3/2=(a~Tu~)e14v~TB1v~(πndet(B))3/2,u~=12B1v~

+dx~ex~TBx~+v~Tx~(a~Tx~)(b~Tx~)=(a~Tv~T)(b~Tv~T)e14v~TB1v~(πndet(B))3/2=(12a~TB1b~+(a~Tu~)(b~Tu~))e12v~Tu~(πndet(B))3/2,whereB=BT

+dx~ex~TBx~+v~Tx~(x~TFx~)=(32trace(FB1)+u~TFu~)e14v~TB1v~(πndet(B))3/2,

+dx~ex~TAx~+s~'Tx~(x~Λx~T)ex~TAx~+s~Tx~=(6trace(AΛAB1)+4u~TAΛAu~2u~TAΛs~2s~'TΛAu~+s~'TΛs~)e14v~TB1v~(πndet(B))3/2,B=A+A,v~=s~+s~

Appendix B: some integrals with 1D Gaussians

First the overlap (denoted N and used in the following expressions)

dxexTBx+vTx=e14vB1v(πndet(B))=N

Polynomial like terms

dxexTBx+vTx×(aTx)=N×12(aTB1v)

dxexTBx+vTx×(xTFx)=N×[12Trace(FB1)+14vTB1v]

for any matrix F with the right dimensions including F=abT.

dxexTBx+vTx×(aTxxTFx)=

dxexTBx+vTx×(xTFx)(xTPx)=

Exponential and sinusoidal terms

dxexTBx+vTx×aecTx=N×ae14cTB1c+12cB1v

(Co)Sine term:

Due to the Euler formulae for (Co)Sine and the linearity we can express these matrix elements as the (Real) Imaginary part of the above matrix element with complex vector c=il

dxexTBx+vTx×acos(lTx)=N×acos(12lTB1v)e14lB1l

dxexTBx+vTx×asin(lTx)=N×asin(12lTB1v)e14lB1l


Gaussian term:

dxexTBx+vTx×G0gπeg(aTxR)2=N×gπ(1+gaTB1a)eg1+gaTB1a(12aTB1vR)2

Delta term:

This can be calculated as the limiting case g of the previous matrix element

dxexTBx+vTx×δ(aTxR)=N×1πaTB1ae1aTB1a(12aTB1vR)2

Template:Shelves Template:Status