Differentiable Manifolds/Lie algebras and the vector field Lie bracket

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Navigation

Lie algebras

Template:TextBox

Template:TextBox

The vector field Lie bracket

Template:TextBox

Theorem 6.4: If 𝐕,𝐖 are vector fields of class π’žn on M, then [𝐕,𝐖] is a vector field of class π’žn on M (i. e. [,] really maps to 𝔛(M))

Proof:

1. We show that for each pM, [𝐕,𝐖](p)T(p)M. Let φ,ϑπ’ž(M) and cℝ.

1.1 We prove linearity:

[𝐕,𝐖](p)(φ+cϑ)=𝐕(p)(𝐖(φ+cϑ))𝐖(p)(𝐕(φ+cϑ))=𝐕(p)(𝐖φ+c𝐖ϑ)𝐖(p)(𝐕φ+c𝐕ϑ)=𝐕(p)(𝐖φ)𝐖(p)(𝐕φ)+c(𝐕(p)(𝐖ϑ)𝐖(p)(𝐕ϑ))=[𝐕,𝐖](p)(φ)+c[𝐕,𝐖](p)(ϑ)

1.2 We prove the product rule:

[𝐕,𝐖](p)(φϑ)=𝐕(p)(𝐖(φϑ))𝐖(p)(𝐕(φϑ))=𝐕(p)(φ𝐖ϑ+ϑ𝐖φ)𝐖(p)(φ𝐕ϑ+ϑ𝐕φ)=𝐕(p)(φ𝐖ϑ)+𝐕(p)(ϑ𝐖φ)𝐖(p)(φ𝐕ϑ)𝐖(p)(ϑ𝐕φ)=φ(p)𝐕(p)(𝐖ϑ)+(Yϑ)(p)=Y(p)(ϑ)𝐕(p)(φ)+ϑ(p)𝐕(p)(𝐖φ)+(Yφ)(p)=Y(p)(φ)𝐕(p)(ϑ)φ(p)𝐖(p)(𝐕ϑ)(Xϑ)(p)=X(p)(ϑ)𝐖(p)(φ)ϑ(p)𝐖(p)(𝐕φ)(Xφ)(p)=X(p)(φ)𝐖(p)(ϑ)=φ(p)𝐕(p)(𝐖ϑ)φ(p)𝐖(p)(𝐕ϑ)+ϑ(p)𝐕(p)(𝐖φ)ϑ(p)𝐖(p)(𝐕φ)=φ(p)[𝐕,𝐖](p)(ϑ)+ϑ(p)[𝐕,𝐖](p)(φ)

2. We show that [𝐕,𝐖] is differentiable of class π’žn.

Let φπ’žn(M) be arbitrary. As 𝐕,𝐖 are vector fields of class π’žn, 𝐕φ and 𝐖φ are contained in π’žn(M). But since 𝐕,𝐖 are vector fields of class π’žn, 𝐕(𝐖φ) and 𝐖(𝐕φ) are contained in π’žn(M). But the sum of two differentiable functions is again differentiable (this is what theorem 2.? says), and thus [𝐕,𝐖]φ is in π’žn(M), and since φ was arbitrary, [𝐕,𝐖] is differentiable of class π’žn.

Theorem 6.5:

If M is a manifold, and [,] is the vector field Lie bracket, then 𝔛(M) and [,] form a Lie algebra together.

Proof:

1. First we note that 𝔛(M) as defined in definition 5.? is a vector space (this was covered by exercise 5.?).

2. Second, we prove that for the vector Lie bracket, the three calculation rules of definition 6.1 are satisfied. Let 𝐕,𝐖,𝐔𝔛(M) and cℝ.

2.1 We prove bilinearity. For all pM and φπ’žn(M), we have

[𝐕,𝐖+c𝐔](p)(φ)=𝐕(p)((𝐖+c𝐔)φ)(𝐖+c𝐔)(p)(𝐕φ)=𝐕(p)(𝐖φ+c𝐔φ)𝐖(p)(𝐕φ)c𝐔(p)(𝐕φ)=𝐕(p)(𝐖φ)𝐖(p)(𝐕φ)+c𝐕(p)(𝐔φ)c𝐔(p)(𝐕φ)=[𝐕,𝐖](p)(φ)+c[𝐕,𝐔](p)(φ)

and hence, since pM and φπ’žn(M) were arbitrary,

[𝐕,𝐖+c𝐔]=[𝐕,𝐖]+c[𝐕,𝐔]

Analogously (see exercise 1), it can be proven that

[𝐕+c𝐖,𝐔]=[𝐕,𝐔]+c[𝐖,𝐔]

2.2 We prove skew-symmetry. We have for all pM and φπ’žn(M):

[𝐕,𝐖](p)(φ)=𝐕(p)(𝐖φ)𝐖(p)(𝐕φ)=(𝐖(p)(𝐕φ)𝐕(p)(𝐖φ))=[𝐖,𝐕](p)(φ)

2.3 We prove Jacobi's identity. We have for all pM and φπ’žn(M):

[𝐕,[𝐖,𝐔]](p)(φ)+[𝐔,[𝐕,𝐖]](p)(φ)+[𝐖,[𝐔,𝐕]](p)(φ)=𝐕(p)([𝐖,𝐔]φ)[𝐖,𝐔](p)(𝐕φ)+𝐔(p)([𝐕,𝐖]φ)[𝐕,𝐖](p)(𝐔φ)+𝐖(p)([𝐔,𝐕]φ)[𝐔,𝐕](p)(𝐖φ)=𝐕(p)(𝐖(𝐔φ)𝐔(𝐖φ))𝐖(p)(𝐔(𝐕φ))+𝐔(p)(𝐖(𝐕φ))+𝐔(p)(𝐕(𝐖φ)𝐖(𝐕φ))𝐕(p)(𝐖(𝐔φ))+𝐖(p)(𝐕(𝐔φ))+𝐖(p)(𝐔(𝐕φ)𝐕(𝐔φ))𝐔(p)(𝐕(𝐖φ))+𝐕(p)(𝐔(𝐖φ))=0

, where the last equality follows from the linearity of 𝐕(p),𝐖(p) and 𝐔(p).

Template:Navigation