Introductory Linear Algebra/System of linear equations

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Systems of linear equations in matrix form

We should define what is Template:Colored em before expressing it in matrix form. Template:Colored definition Template:Colored remark

We often use the terms 'Template:Colored em' and 'Template:Colored em' to describe the number of solutions of a system of linear equations. Template:Colored definition Template:Colored remark Template:Colored example Template:Colored example Template:Colored example Template:Colored exercise After defining a Template:Colored em, we can express it in matrix form in multiple ways, as in the following definition. Template:Colored definition Template:Colored remark Template:Colored example Template:Colored exercise

Gauss-Jordan algorithm

Template:Colored definition Template:Colored remark Template:Colored definition Template:Colored remark Template:Colored example Template:Colored exercise Template:Colored proposition

Proof. Outline: There is a reverse process (i.e. performing the ERO with its reverse process together, in arbitrary orders, will have no effect on matrix) for each type of EROs, which is also a ERO itself, as illustrated below:

  • the reverse process of type I ERO 𝐫i𝐫j is also 𝐫i𝐫j
  • the reverse process of type II ERO k𝐫i𝐫i is type II ERO 1k𝐫i𝐫i (if k=0, this ERO is undefined, this is why k must be nonzero for type II ERO, so that it is reversible)
  • the reverse process of type III ERO k𝐫j+𝐫i𝐫i is type III ERO k𝐫j+𝐫i𝐫i

Template:Colored example Template:Colored exercise Template:Colored proposition

Proof. Outline: It suffices to show that the solution set is unchanged if we perform one ERO. E.g.

  • Type I ERO:

Compare {x+2y=34x+5y=6 and {4x+5y=6x+2y=3

  • Type II ERO:

Compare {x+2y=34x+5y=6 and {kx+2ky=3k4x+5y=6{x+2y=34x+5y=6(k0)

  • Type III ERO:

Compare {x+2y=34x+5y=6 and {x+2y=3(1)(4+k)x+(5+2k)y=6+3k(2) (1)k(2): (4+kk)x+(5+2k2k)y=6+3k3k4x+5y=6

Template:Colored exercise Template:Colored definition Template:Colored example Template:Colored exercise Template:Colored definition Template:Colored definition Template:Colored example Template:Colored exercise Template:Colored definition Template:Colored remark Template:Colored example Template:Colored exercise Template:Colored proposition Template:Colored remark Template:Colored example Template:Colored remark Template:Colored exercise Template:Colored definition Template:Colored remark Template:Colored example Template:Colored proposition

Proof. The augmented matrix of the homogeneous system of m linear equations in n unknowns is A𝐱=𝟎 is (A|𝟎), and thus its RREF has the form (R|𝟎) in which R is of size m×n, since there are m linear equations and n unknowns.

If R has a leading one in each of the first n columns, then there are at least n rows in R. However, R has only m<n rows, a contradiction. Thus, the homogeneous SLE does not have a unique solution.

Since a SLE can either have no solutions (which is impossible for a homogeneous SLE), a unique solution (which is impossible in this case), or infinitely many solutions, it follows that the homogeneous SLE must have infinitely many solutions, and thus have a nontrivial solution.

Template:Colored remark Template:Colored example

Template:Nav

Template:BookCat