Linear Algebra/Topic: Input-Output Analysis

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Navigation An economy is an immensely complicated network of interdependences. Changes in one part can ripple out to affect other parts. Economists have struggled to be able to describe, and to make predictions about, such a complicated object. Mathematical models using systems of linear equations have emerged as a key tool. One is Input-Output Analysis, pioneered by W. Leontief, who won the 1973 Nobel Prize in Economics.

Consider an economy with many parts, two of which are the steel industry and the auto industry. As they work to meet the demand for their product from other parts of the economy, that is, from users external to the steel and auto sectors, these two interact tightly. For instance, should the external demand for autos go up, that would lead to an increase in the auto industry's usage of steel. Or, should the external demand for steel fall, then it would lead to a fall in steel's purchase of autos. The type of Input-Output model we will consider takes in the external demands and then predicts how the two interact to meet those demands.

We start with a listing of production and consumption statistics. (These numbers, giving dollar values in millions, are excerpted from Template:Harv, describing the 1958 U.S. economy. Today's statistics would be quite different, both because of inflation and because of technical changes in the industries.)

  used by  
  steel  
  used by  
  auto  
  used by  
  others  
  total  
  value of  
  steel  
  5 395     2 664     25 448  
  value of  
  auto  
  48     9 030     30 346  

For instance, the dollar value of steel used by the auto industry in this year is 2,664 million. Note that industries may consume some of their own output.

We can fill in the blanks for the external demand. This year's value of the steel used by others this year is 17,389 and this year's value of the auto used by others is 21,268. With that, we have a complete description of the external demands and of how auto and steel interact, this year, to meet them.

Now, imagine that the external demand for steel has recently been going up by 200 per year and so we estimate that next year it will be 17,589. Imagine also that for similar reasons we estimate that next year's external demand for autos will be down 25 to 21,243. We wish to predict next year's total outputs.

That prediction isn't as simple as adding 200 to this year's steel total and subtracting 25 from this year's auto total. For one thing, a rise in steel will cause that industry to have an increased demand for autos, which will mitigate, to some extent, the loss in external demand for autos. On the other hand, the drop in external demand for autos will cause the auto industry to use less steel, and so lessen somewhat the upswing in steel's business. In short, these two industries form a system, and we need to predict the totals at which the system as a whole will settle.

For that prediction, let s be next years total production of steel and let a be next year's total output of autos. We form these equations.


next year's production of steel=next year's use of steel by steel+next year's use of steel by auto+next year's use of steel by othersnext year's production of autos=next year's use of autos by steel+next year's use of autos by auto+next year's use of autos by others


On the left side of those equations go the unknowns s and a. At the ends of the right sides go our external demand estimates for next year 17,589 and 21,243. For the remaining four terms, we look to the table of this year's information about how the industries interact.

For instance, for next year's use of steel by steel, we note that this year the steel industry used 5395 units of steel input to produce 25,448 units of steel output. So next year, when the steel industry will produce s units out, we expect that doing so will take s(5395)/(25448) units of steel input— this is simply the assumption that input is proportional to output. (We are assuming that the ratio of input to output remains constant over time; in practice, models may try to take account of trends of change in the ratios.)

Next year's use of steel by the auto industry is similar. This year, the auto industry uses 2664 units of steel input to produce 30346 units of auto output. So next year, when the auto industry's total output is a, we expect it to consume a(2664)/(30346) units of steel.

Filling in the other equation in the same way, we get this system of linear equation.


539525448s+266430346a+17589=s4825448s+903030346a+21243=a


Gauss' method on this system.


(20053/25448)s(2664/30346)a=17589(48/25448)s+(21316/30346)a=21243


gives s=25698 and a=30311.

Looking back, recall that above we described why the prediction of next year's totals isn't as simple as adding 200 to last year's steel total and subtracting 25 from last year's auto total. In fact, comparing these totals for next year to the ones given at the start for the current year shows that, despite the drop in external demand, the total production of the auto industry is predicted to rise. The increase in internal demand for autos caused by steel's sharp rise in business more than makes up for the loss in external demand for autos.

One of the advantages of having a mathematical model is that we can ask "What if ...?" questions. For instance, we can ask "What if the estimates for next year's external demands are somewhat off?" To try to understand how much the model's predictions change in reaction to changes in our estimates, we can try revising our estimate of next year's external steel demand from 17,589 down to 17,489, while keeping the assumption of next year's external demand for autos fixed at 21,243. The resulting system


(20053/25448)s(2664/30346)a=17489(48/25448)s+(21316/30346)a=21243


when solved gives s=25571 and a=30311. This kind of exploration of the model is sensitivity analysis. We are seeing how sensitive the predictions of our model are to the accuracy of the assumptions.

Obviously, we can consider larger models that detail the interactions among more sectors of an economy. These models are typically solved on a computer, using the techniques of matrix algebra that we will develop in Chapter Three. Some examples are given in the exercises. Obviously also, a single model does not suit every case; expert judgment is needed to see if the assumptions underlying the model are reasonable for a particular case. With those caveats, however, this model has proven in practice to be a useful and accurate tool for economic analysis. For further reading, try Template:Harv and Template:Harv.


Exercises

Hint: these systems are easiest to solve on a computer. Template:TextBox Template:TextBox Template:TextBox Template:TextBox Template:TextBox

/Solutions/

References

Template:Navigation

Template:BookCat