Math for Non-Geeks/Exponential series

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

{{#invoke:Math for Non-Geeks/Seite|oben}}

The exponential series has the form e=k=01k!. We wil see that he limit e indeed exists and is given by Euler's number, which we encountered first within the article Monotonicity criterion. There, it was defined as the limit of the seqeuences ((1+1n)n)n and ((1+1n)n+1)n. In this article, we will show the limit equivalence limn(1+1n)n=limn(1+1n)n+1=e=k=01k! which is far from obvious. Later, we will investigate a generalized form of the exponential series k=0xkk!.

Convergence of the exponential series

At first, we need to show that the exponential series converges at all:

Math for Non-Geeks: Template:Satz

Limit of the exponential series

Now, we show that the exponential series indeed converges towards Euler's number e. This is done using the squeeze theorem by "squeezing" the partial sums (sn)n=(k=0n1k!)n between the sequences ((1+1n)n)n and ((1+1n)n+1)n . Both bounding sequences converge to e , so we get the desired result.

That means, we need to show: Template:Math

Math for Non-Geeks: Template:Satz

Remarks

  • Alternatively, one may show lim infnk=0n1k!elim supnk=0n1k! , which also implies k=01k!=e.
  • Further, the sequences an=k=0n1k! and bn=k=0n1k!+1nn! define nested intervals (In)n=([an,bn])n, where the real number included in all intervals is exactly e.
  • The advantage if the exponential series compared to the sequences defining e is that one can achieve much faster convergence. For instance, with 10 elements k=0101k!2.7182818011 which is an approximation precise up to 7 digits: e=2.718281828. By contrast, the 1000-th sequence element (1+11000)1000=2.7169239 is precise to only 2 digits after the comma.

Outlook: generalized exponential series

As remarked in the introduction, there is a generalization to the exponential series, which reads k=0xkk! . This series can be shown to converge for all x . Therefore, it serves for a real-valued exponential function exp: . Even complex arguments are possible! However, exp(x) is a priori not the same as a power ex. So the computation rules for powers, like exp(x+y)=exp(x)exp(y), must be shown explicitly.

The series considered within this article is a special case with x=1:

Template:Math

{{#invoke:Math for Non-Geeks/Seite|unten}}

Template:BookCat