Math for Non-Geeks/ Root test
{{#invoke:Math for Non-Geeks/Seite|oben}}
Let us turn our attention to the root test, which is a powerful tool for proving the convergence or divergence of a given series. It is based off the direct comparison test, in fact we will compare the series with the geometric series with .
Derivation
Recap
We have already learned how to use the direct comparison test with a majorant. In summary, a series with is convergent, if there exists a convergent series with .
Furthermore we know that every geometric series with is convergent.
First derivation
Let be a series. Also let for all , because this is a constraint we need for the direct comparison test. For our majorant we need a with . Then we have
The series is convergent by our direct comparison test. The inequality can be transformed:
Thus if there exists a with , so that , then and the series is convergent.
Math for Non-Geeks: Template:Frage
Bringing limit superior into play
For the convergence behaviour we can ignore the value of finitely many summands. Thus must not be satisfied for all , but for all , with finitely many exceptions. So the inequality must be satisfied for almost all .
We can restate the requirement, that there must exist a with for almost all , using the limit superior:
Or in other terms:
If for almost all , the succession is bounded above and must have an accumulation point less than or equal to . This accumulation point is equal to and .
Conversely, let for a . Then for all all the inequality is satisfied for almost all . Because there exists , that is small enough so that . Set . We have and the inequality holds for almost all .
Summary: Instead of for almost all it suffices to show , to prove convergence the series.
What about absolute convergence?
What happens if not all ? Then we cannot use the above argumentation, because for even and the values is not defined. But we still have a valid argumentation if we talk about , to show the absolute convergence of the series (from which normal convergence follows immediately). Thus for series with for all we have . In this case nothing changes because for we can also use . The conclusion is:
Root test for divergence
We have derived the root test to show the convergence of a series. Can we also derive a criterion for divergence? Let us assume that . Then for infinitely many we have the inequality . For these we have , thus cannot be a null sequence. But then is also no null sequence. From the term test it follows immediately that is divergent. We can generalize this case if instead of we require the inequality for almost all .
Theorem
Math for Non-Geeks: Template:Satz
Math for Non-Geeks: Template:Hinweis
Limitations of the root test
In case we cannot say whether we have convergence or divergence. In fact there exist both convergent and divergent series that satisfy this equation. First consider the harmonic series , which is divergent. We have
But also the convergent series satisfies this equation:
These examples show that we cannot conclude convergence or divergence from . In this case we have to employ another convergence criterion!
How to apply the root test
To apply the root test on a series we can proceed as follows: We compute and find the limit (if the limit exists) or the limit superior.
- If , then the series converges absolutely.
- If , then the series diverges.
- If for infinitely many , then the series diverges.
- Else, if none of the above is true, we cannot make a statement about convergence behaviour using the root test.
Exercises
Exercise 1
Math for Non-Geeks: Template:Aufgabe
Exercise 2
Math for Non-Geeks: Template:Aufgabe
{{#invoke:Math for Non-Geeks/Seite|unten}}
